(500) Days of Summer
I just saw the movie (500) Days of Summer. Good movie. I liked so much about it.
Such as?
(Don’t read if you don’t want to be at all spoiled, Frank Costanza, but everyone who has seen the trailer or read a review or two may safely continue reading.)
- Well, starting at the beginning, “This is a story of boy meets girl. But you should know up front, this is not a love story.”
- From there, I like that the movie delves into the topic of relationships that don’t slide neatly into place. “I like you but you don’t like me, but then you give me signs and –” it’s all so fragile. Highs and lows. I believe it. I mean, I’ve been there. We’ve all been there. I watch a typical romantic movie and I don’t get that same feeling. But this isn’t typical. It’s more of an uplifting, artsy flick. See, not all arthouse films that feel real and have meaning are depressing.
- So yeah, I liked that it wasn’t fluffy and neat. I thought it did a good job of being and feeling real. Part of me thinks this is the kind of movie that just might make for a good date movie. Well, depending on the after-movie conversation, haha. Maybe it’d be a bad first-date movie if the couple was unbalanced. Who has hand?!
- And while at first I thought it seemed, ah, stereotypical to have a quirky movie told in non-chronological order, I think it makes sense here since the movie seemed to be a reflection of how we remember things, looking back. First we remember the good, then we remember the bad. Then we’re over it and then we’re in it. We dissect it every which way possible.
- Speaking of technical aspects of the story-telling, I liked the editing. I think the movie was exactly as long as it needed to be. There weren’t a lot of (any?) superfluous scenes. There were no silly interludes because the studio’s focus groups determined that a joke was needed at this moment or that moment. It stayed on target.
- Related, I thought there was some fun, Amélie-style directing throughout. I could go on with examples, but to limit myself to one, there’s a few minutes during the movie where they run a split screen sub-titled Reality and Expectations. Good stuff. Again, who hasn’t been there?
- Oh, I liked the two lead actors. I thought they both filled their roles well. It doesn’t feel like either actor is trying to portray something that isn’t them.
- I liked that the movie didn’t cheat (or, cheat much). There were no extended, zoomed in scenes with tragic music rising in volume to make you feel what the characters or dialogue may not have evoked on their own.
- And I enjoyed the take on love. A little bit romantic, a little bit real… a little bit destiny and fate and love-at-first-sight, and a little bit about how it’s more our interpretations and what we’re looking for and coincidences to which we add meaning. Sometimes you think you have it all figured out and then you don’t.
- I loved the ending. A few minutes before “it, the ending” happened, I started thinking it might happen in a way that might not be good — and it ended that way and… it was good after all. For a split second, I thought I was heading for a bad ending and then just as quickly I realized it was the right ending, the honest ending, the ending that happens a lot of the time in real life. And I love the title. I can’t think of a more perfect title.
I also love that I was able to watch the movie and, after it ended, think about how happy I am to be with Candice. Sometimes, romantic movies have a reverse effect on me where I wonder what I’m doing with my life and why I’m with who I’m with and what it’s all about and so on. Right now, though, I just feel happy.

